Do we consider we know how to eat a hamburger? You do not.
According to “life hacks” consultant Grant Thompson — best famous on YouTube as a King of Random — a best approach to eat a hamburger is in fact upside down, so that a tip bun (with a sesame seeds) is on a bottom, ancillary a burger, and a bottom bun (flat, though sesame seeds) is on a top.
The emanate is constructional integrity: As Thompson explains, a tip half of a hamburger bun is “twice as thick” as a bottom part, and “a lot some-more durable.” And since it rests atop a burger, rather than underneath it, it is reduction expected to have been enervated by burger juices and/or sauces, that can lead to bottom bun collapse.
But if we flip a burger, afterwards we have a thicker and therefore some-more structurally sound bottom of support for your sandwich. Thus, “your stuffing will start to soak into a tip half of a bun, rather than out a sides” — distinct a bottom, a tip is not nonetheless jam-packed — and so it’s “much reduction expected you’ll humour any neglected spillages.” Additionally, if a burger has been assembled in suitability with customary protocol, a lettuce will now be underneath a patty, rather than on tip of it, and so will double as a season ensure to locate erring drops of sauce.
This, of course, is not Thompson’s usually tip for easy improved living. The same video also facilities hacks for slicing mangos, celebration from straws, determining infestations of ants, and portion potato chips during parties. Nor is this a usually penetrate on a internet for eating hamburgers: There are techniques for holding hamburgers (lightly, with 3 fingers uniformly widespread on top, thumbs and pinkies on bottom); shaping hamburgers (use a jar lid); ensuring juicy hamburgers (add ice); and correctly sequencing burger accouterments (again, lettuce on bottom).
Do we need to do any of these things? Probably not! But a guileful interest of a life penetrate is that nothing of it is accurately necessary. You might have been “doing it wrong” before, like all those other plebes who don’t know to weave their BLT bacon into tiny bacon tapestries (bacon in each bite!) or cut their cakes (all a approach across, apparently) or use their cheese graters horizontally (good tip!) or scrupulously vacuum-seal their ziplock bags (use your mouth), though we were still some-more or reduction doing it.
Instead, a life penetrate is an unmerited advantage — we are only slightly higher to everybody else (truly, a common lifetime goal), a tiny savvier, marginally some-more efficient. And infrequently they work, these life hacks! Peeling off a skin, rather than scooping out a flesh, is indeed a improved approach to ready an avocado. (Other life hacks sojourn questionable: The jury is still out, for example, on a potency of adding baking soda to a H2O for easier-to-peel hard-boiled eggs.)
What is sinister about life hacking is not a tips themselves — many are good, and regardless, roughly all are pardonable — though rather what they represent: a consistent competition for efficiency, not only in working, though in sleeping, eating, breathing, and being married. It is, as Nikil Saval argued during Pacific Standard, that hacks have incited a act of existent into “a set of problems to solve and systems to optimize.” (It is not a fluke that life hacking echoes a most progressing American obsession: maximizing a potency of a industrial workforce.)
At a same time, a life penetrate offers hope. There is a improved approach to be a chairman in a world! And maybe that alleviation is about your lunch, and not, say, a rapist probity complement — a life penetrate is always tiny and always personal — though hope, during any scale, is appealing. You are so tighten to a some-more ideal existence; only change a approach we reason your burger, and a improved life awaits.